We've recently updated the navigation
You can find APIs and Integrations in their own sections in the horizontal menu bar at the top of the page.
Some tasks need to be run with very strict concurrency rules to ensure they don't collide with each other. Common examples for needing concurrency control are deployments, app releases and infrastructure tasks.
To help you control concurrency, Buildkite provides two primitives: concurrency limits and concurrency groups. While these two primitives are closely linked and interdependent, they operate at different levels.
Concurrency limits define the number of jobs that are allowed to run at any one time. These limits are set per-step and only apply to jobs that are based on that step.
Setting a concurrency limit of
1 on a step in your pipeline will ensure that no two jobs created from that step will run at the same time, even if there are agents available.
You can add concurrency limits to steps either through Buildkite, or your
pipeline.yml file. When adding a concurrency limit, you'll also need the
concurrency_group attribute so that steps in other pipelines can use it as well.
I'm seeing an error about a missing `concurrency_group_id` when I run my pipeline upload
This error is caused by a missing `concurrency_group` attribute. Add this attribute to the same step where you defined the `concurrency` attribute.
Concurrency groups are labels that group together Buildkite jobs when applying concurrency limits. When you add a group label to a step the label becomes available to all Pipelines in that organization. These group labels are checked at job runtime to determine which jobs are allowed to run in parallel. Although concurrency groups are created on individual steps, they represent concurrent access to shared resources and can be used by other pipelines.
A concurrency group works like a queue; it returns jobs in the order they entered the queue (oldest to newest). The concurrency group only cares about jobs in "active" states. and the group becomes "locked" when the concurrency limit for jobs in these states is reached. Once a job moves from an active state to a terminal state (
cancelled) the job is removed from the queue, opening up a spot for another job to enter.
The full list of "active" job states is
The following is an example command step that ensures deployments run one at a time. If multiple builds are created with this step, each deployment job will be queued up and run one after the other in the order they were created.
Make sure your
concurrency_group names are unique, unless they're accessing a shared resource like a deployment target.
For example, if you have two pipelines that each deploy to a different target but you give them both the
deploy, they will be part of the same concurrency group and will not be able to run at the same time, even though they're accessing separate deployment targets. Unique concurrency group names such as
my-mobile-app/app-store-release, will ensure that each one is part of its own concurrency group.
Concurrency groups guarantee that jobs will be run in the order that they were created in. Jobs inherit the creation time of their parent. Parents of jobs can be either a build or a pipeline upload job. As pipeline uploads add more jobs to the build after it has started, the jobs that they add will inherit the creation time of the pipeline upload rather than the build.
Sometimes you need strict concurrency while also having jobs that would benefit from parallelism. In these situations you can use concurrency gates to control which jobs run in parallel and which jobs run one at a time.
In the following setup, only one build at a time can enter the concurrency gate, but within that gate up to three e2e tests can run in parallel, subject to Agent availability. Putting the
stage-deploy section in the gate as well ensures that every time there is a deployment made to the staging environment, the e2e tests are carried out on that deployment:
By default, steps that belong to the same concurrency group are run in the order that they are added to the pipeline.
For example, if you have two steps:
Ain concurrency group
Xwith a concurrency of
1at time 0
Bwith the same concurrency group
Xand also a concurrency of
1at time 1
Step A will always run before step B. This is the default behaviour (
ordered), and most helpful for deployments.
However, in some cases concurrency groups are used to restrict access to a limited resource, such as a SaaS service like Sauce Labs. In that case, the default ordering of the jobs can work against you, as one step waits for the next before taking up another concurrency slot.
If your resource usage time is very different, for example if tests in pipeline A take 1 minute to run and tests in pipeline B take 10 minutes to run, the default ordering is not helpful because it means that the limited resource you're controlling concurrency for is not fully utilized.
In that case, setting the concurrency method to
eager, removes the ordering condition for that resource.
If you're using
eager concurrency and job prioritization, higher priority jobs will always take precedence when a concurrency slot becomes available.