Jenkins vs Harness

Comparing two powerful CI/CD automation platforms

Introduction to Jenkins

Overview

What is Jenkins

Jenkins was initially released in 2004 as Hudson, before becoming Jenkins in 2011 following a fork from Oracle's control. With nearly two decades of development, Jenkins has established itself as one of the most widely adopted CI/CD solutions in the industry. Written in Java, Jenkins has proven its reliability and stability across numerous production environments. The project is maintained by a vast and active community of users and contributors who continually evolve and improve the platform. Jenkins provides a server-based system that allows developers to automate various stages of their build pipeline and offers tremendous flexibility through its extensive plugin ecosystem with over 1,700 plugins.

Extensible Plugin Architecture

Tower and Logos

Pipeline as Code


pipeline {
    agent any // Specifies that the pipeline can run on any available agent

    stages {
        stage('Build') { // Defines a stage named 'Build'
            steps {
                echo "Building the application..." // Executes a simple echo command
                sh 'mvn clean install' // Executes a shell command to build with Maven
            }
        }

        stage('Test') { // Defines a stage named 'Test'
            steps {
                echo "Running tests..."
                sh 'mvn test' // Executes a shell command to run tests with Maven
                junit '**/target/surefire-reports/*.xml' // Publishes JUnit test results
            }
        }

        stage('Deploy') { // Defines a stage named 'Deploy'
            when {
                branch 'main' // This stage only runs when the branch is 'main'
            }
            steps {
                echo "Deploying the application..."
                // Add deployment steps here, e.g., 'sh 'scp target/myapp.jar user@server:/path'
            }
        }
    }

    post { // Defines post-build actions
        always {
            echo "Pipeline finished."
        }
        success {
            echo "Build successful!"
        }
        failure {
            echo "Build failed!"
        }
    }
}

Distributed Build Architecture

Build model

What are the trade offs?

Advantages

  1. Open-Source and Free: Jenkins is completely free and open-source, which eliminates licensing costs and provides full access to the source code. This makes it accessible to organizations of all sizes, from small startups to large enterprises.
  2. Extensive Community Support: With a vast and active community, Jenkins users benefit from extensive documentation, forums, and a wealth of shared knowledge. This community-driven approach ensures continuous improvement and quick resolution of issues.
  3. Flexibility and Customization: The extensive plugin ecosystem allows Jenkins to be configured for almost any continuous integration and delivery workflow. Organizations can tailor Jenkins to their specific needs, integrating with preferred tools and technologies.
  4. Multi-platform Support: Jenkins can run on various operating systems including Windows, macOS, and different Unix variants like Ubuntu and OpenSUSE, making it adaptable to diverse infrastructure environments.

Disadvantages

  1. Complex Configuration and Maintenance: Jenkins can be complex to set up and maintain, particularly for large-scale deployments. The web UI-driven interaction model can lead to configuration drift without proper management of pipeline-as-code practices.
  2. Security Challenges: As an open-source tool, Jenkins requires careful security management to prevent vulnerabilities. Organizations need to stay vigilant about updating plugins and implementing proper authentication and authorization controls.
  3. Resource Intensive: Jenkins can consume significant system resources, especially as the number of jobs and plugins increases. The master server can become a performance bottleneck in large deployments without proper optimization.
  4. Outdated User Interface: While functional, Jenkins' user interface is often criticized for being outdated and less intuitive compared to more modern CI/CD platforms, though recent updates have aimed to modernize the look and feel.

Introduction to Harness

Overview

What is Harness

Harness was founded in 2016 as a proprietary continuous delivery platform and has since evolved into a comprehensive DevOps platform. The company expanded its capabilities in 2020 by acquiring Drone.io, a self-service continuous integration platform, which forms the foundation of Harness CI. Harness has positioned itself as an AI-native software delivery platform, focusing on developer self-service and intelligent automation. Originally developed as a CD solution for virtual machines, Harness now offers a unified platform designed to provide full traceability throughout the entire software lifecycle.

Automation with AI

Box with shadows

Unified DevOps Platform

Connect dots with check marks

Continuous Verification

Lots of connected dots

What are the trade offs?

Advantages

  1. Developer Self-Service: Harness accelerates developer onboarding with a low-effort enterprise-grade Internal Developer Portal (IDP) built on Backstage. This self-service approach empowers developers to manage their workflows with less dependence on operations teams.
  2. Ready-Made Deployment Strategies: Harness provides out-of-the-box deployment templates for blue/green, canary, and rolling deployments, making it easier to implement advanced deployment strategies without extensive configuration.
  3. Cloud Cost Optimization: The platform includes cloud cost management features that help organizations optimize their cloud spending through AI-powered recommendations, policy enforcement, and compliance at scale.
  4. Enterprise-Grade Security: Harness offers enhanced security features including automated security testing orchestration, vulnerability remediation, and governance controls that integrate directly into CI/CD pipelines.

Disadvantages

  1. Pricing Structure: Unlike open-source alternatives like Jenkins, Harness operates on a subscription-based model for its enterprise edition, which may be a significant consideration for budget-conscious organizations or smaller teams.
  2. Learning Curve: The extensive feature set and integrated platform approach can present a steeper learning curve for teams transitioning from simpler CI/CD tools, requiring additional training and adaptation time.
  3. Limited Self-Help Resources: Compared to more established tools, Harness has fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community content available, making self-guided learning and troubleshooting more challenging.
  4. Complex RBAC Configuration: The role-based access control (RBAC) system in recent Harness versions can be confusing to configure and maintain, potentially creating challenges for administrators managing permissions across large teams.

Jenkins vs Harness: Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Deployment Automation

Jenkins

Jenkins requires configuration through plugins and scripting to create deployment automation workflows. While highly customizable, this typically involves more manual setup and maintenance of deployment processes.

Harness

Harness provides built-in automated deployment capabilities with pre-configured templates for strategies like blue/green and canary deployments. It includes automated verification and intelligent rollbacks without requiring extensive scripting.

Architecture & Scalability

Jenkins

Jenkins uses a master/agent architecture where one Jenkins controller manages Jenkins agents. While this allows for distributed builds, the controller can become a bottleneck in large-scale deployments without careful management.

Harness

Harness employs a microservices architecture with a Manager and Delegate model. The Delegate runs in your environment and connects to the Manager, enabling better scalability and allowing each service to scale independently based on resource needs.

Pipeline Definition

Jenkins

Jenkins offers Pipeline as Code through Jenkinsfiles written in Groovy DSL. This approach allows version control of pipeline configurations, but historically Jenkins relied heavily on manual UI configuration that could lead to configuration drift.

Harness

Harness supports both YAML configuration files and a visual pipeline editor. Its Pipeline as Code approach ensures version control while the visual editor makes pipeline creation and management more accessible to teams with varying technical expertise.

Integration Capabilities

Jenkins

Jenkins excels with over 1,700 plugins that enable integration with virtually any DevOps tool. This extensive ecosystem allows for high customization but requires managing plugin compatibility and updates.

Harness

Harness offers 40+ security scanner integrations and connections to common tools including Git repositories, cloud providers, and monitoring systems. While having fewer integrations than Jenkins, Harness focuses on quality-of-integration and seamless connections.

Deployment Verification

Jenkins

Jenkins requires manual configuration of post-deployment verification steps, typically involving custom scripts or third-party plugins to monitor deployment success and trigger rollbacks if needed.

Harness

Harness includes Continuous Verification that automatically monitors deployments for performance or quality regressions using existing monitoring tools. It can automatically detect issues and trigger rollbacks without manual intervention.

User Interface & Experience

Jenkins

Jenkins has a functional but older UI that can feel outdated compared to modern applications. Recent updates have aimed to modernize the interface, but it still maintains its traditional approach to job configuration and management.

Harness

Harness offers a modern, user-friendly interface with both visual editors and code-based options. Its UI is designed for current DevOps practices with features like dashboards for monitoring deployments and pipeline visualizations.

Choosing Between Jenkins and Harness

Jenkins is ideal for:

Harness is ideal for:

Are you looking for a better CI experience?

Start turning complexity into an advantage

Create an account to get started with a 30-day free trial. No credit card required.

Buildkite Pipelines

Platform

  1. Pipelines
  2. Public pipelines
  3. Test Engine
  4. Package Registries
  5. Mobile Delivery Cloud
  6. Pricing

Hosting options

  1. Self-hosted agents
  2. Mac hosted agents
  3. Linux hosted agents

Resources

  1. Docs
  2. Blog
  3. Changelog
  4. Example pipelines
  5. Plugins
  6. Webinars
  7. Case studies
  8. Events
  9. Migration Services
  10. Comparisons

Company

  1. About
  2. Careers
  3. Press
  4. Security
  5. Brand assets
  6. Contact

Solutions

  1. Replace Jenkins
  2. Workflows for AI/ML
  3. Testing at scale
  4. Monorepo mojo
  5. Bazel orchestration

Legal

  1. Terms of Service
  2. Acceptable Use Policy
  3. Privacy Policy
  4. Subprocessors
  5. Service Level Agreement

Support

  1. System status
  2. Forum
© Buildkite Pty Ltd 2025